Prediction evidence
unscoredPolicy v1.0Source post
Published 29 Sept 2026, 14:04 UTC · fetched 12 Oct 2026, 06:27 UTC
The Wolf Of All Streets
@scottmelker
Quoting · 29 Sept 2026, 13:01 UTC · context given to the AI
Bitcoin DOUBLED The Last Time Rates Got This High | Mark Yusko https://t.co/KZ6MGCR7q5Mark Yusko on why higher rates aren't bad for Bitcoin "What does a rising rate environment actually mean? Is it restrictive? People think, oh, if they lower rates, that's printing money; if they raise rates, it's not. That's not actually how it works." "If the Treasury is buying back bonds in size, that is essentially printing money, it's creating money out of thin air to buy back the obligations that you issued before." "The bottom line is you've got to look at total liquidity, and you have to look at global liquidity. China is actually running the printing press much, much faster than anybody else, and global liquidity today, every day, makes new highs." "So the idea that higher rates are bad for Bitcoin just doesn't make any sense to me. Higher rates, interestingly, are a sign of economic strength. Low rates are a sign of economic weakness." "In a world of abundance and economic strength, I'm not sure I buy completely that we're there, but if we were there, that's actually better for any store of value, because in that environment governments are going to print lots and lots and lots of money." "So yeah, lowering rates usually comes when things break."View original on X ↗
How this was scored
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
AI interpretation
Uses only text available at publication time
- Asset
- Bitcoin (BTC)
- Direction
- ▲ Bullish
- Intent
- inferred
- Horizon
- 24 hours (default, none stated)
- Evidence span
- “So the idea that higher rates are bad for Bitcoin just doesn't make any sense to me.”
- Confidence
- 60%
- Review state
- needs review · Low confidence (60%)
- Model / prompt
- gemini-3.1-flash-lite · prompt-v1
Outcome record
- Status
- unscored
- Baseline price
- —
- Evaluation price
- —
- Move
- —
- Neutral threshold
- ±1.00%
- Price provider
- —
- Evaluated at
- 13 Oct 2026, 06:11 UTC
- Policy version
- v1.0
