Prediction evidence

unscoredPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 28 Sept 2026, 17:27 UTC · fetched 13 Oct 2026, 05:55 UTC

Michaël van de Poppe

@CryptoMichNL

It looks to me as if we're going to be trending back up and that this might have been it for $BTC. Reclaim $84,000 and that's a strong signal. https://t.co/nnDh2Eh74J
View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

unscored Repeat call within an existing 24h episode

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

Same 24h episode

Repeated same-asset, same-direction calls count once, anchored to the first eligible post

  • “During times of uncertainty on social media, but clear technical signs of a reversal coming in. That's when you should be taking the bet on going into fundamentally strong assets. That's why @MNFund_ has been allocating more towards the base asset allocation over the summer instead of trading volatility with the algorithm. More potential upside to be made through $BTC, $ETH, $NEAR and other assets. Many signals are indicating that the markets have flipped into a bull cycle much rather than a continuation of the bear market.”Repeat28 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC
  • “The portfolio is now up to $175,000. At the start, I had zero percent of cash. Now, it's at 15% and I'm looking to be adding even more the higher #Altcoins will run. I've trimmed down my $NEAR, scaled up on $EIGEN, $GRASS and $PLUME. I'm a trader and I'll be continuing to be doing this.”Repeat28 Sept 2026, 20:00 UTC

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset
Bitcoin (BTC)
Direction
▲ Bullish
Intent
explicit
Horizon
24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span
“It looks to me as if we're going to be trending back up”
Confidence
80%
Review state
auto accepted
Model / prompt
gemini-3.1-flash-lite · prompt-v1

Outcome record

Status
unscored
Baseline price
—
Evaluation price
—
Move
—
Neutral threshold
±1.00%
Price provider
—
Evaluated at
13 Oct 2026, 06:11 UTC
Policy version
v1.0

Request a correction

Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.

Sign in to request a correction