Prediction evidence
unscoredPolicy v1.0Source post
Published 23 Sept 2026, 17:49 UTC · fetched 12 Oct 2026, 06:27 UTC
The Wolf Of All Streets
@scottmelker
Quoting · 23 Sept 2026, 17:35 UTC · context given to the AI
The Daily Wolf on @YahooFinance 0:00 Bitcoin ETF inflows and a big stablecoin story 1:05 Bitcoin ETFs pull in $2.3B over four days 1:55 Why BlackRock taking only a third of inflows matters 3:37 Not just a short squeeze: a real floor under Bitcoin 5:01 Mastercard and SoFi settle card payments in stablecoins 7:13 Can you invest in it? Stablecoins will eat the world 8:24 Binance puts $100M into Circle, signs 5-year USDC deal 10:12 Binance faces US scrutiny over Iran sanctions 11:05 BitMEX, the exchange that invented the perp, shuts down 12:25 Prediction markets face new integrity questionsOnly a third of Monday's $1B Bitcoin ETF inflows went into $IBIT "When I unpacked the inflows from Monday with Andrew Parish on my show yesterday, he pointed out that only roughly three hundred and something million of that $1B on Monday came from BlackRock." "That may not seem very meaningful, but often on a massive inflow day you'll see that 80, 90, almost all of the inflows come on BlackRock, and you always have to be a little suspicious. Not because there's anything nefarious happening, but BlackRock has the largest options market on top of IBIT, and funds take massive advantage of that options market to do the carry trade or other creative trades where they can effectively earn a yield." "They can buy IBIT instead of buying BTC. They buy IBIT as a representative for BTC, then they can short futures on IBIT, which are a massive market. If they're in contango, futures are priced higher for the future, and they can basically earn a free yield in between. So that is a lot of the buying activity that we see on the huge inflow days for the ETFs." "But when BlackRock is only a third of the inflows and you're seeing sustained inflows across every single product no matter how small, that is really compelling."View original on X ↗
How this was scored
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
AI interpretation
Uses only text available at publication time
- Asset
- Bitcoin (BTC)
- Direction
- ▲ Bullish
- Intent
- inferred
- Horizon
- 24 hours (default, none stated)
- Evidence span
- “But when BlackRock is only a third of the inflows and you're seeing sustained inflows across every single product no matter how small, that is really compelling.”
- Confidence
- 70%
- Review state
- needs review · Low confidence (70%)
- Model / prompt
- gemini-3.1-flash-lite · prompt-v1
Outcome record
- Status
- unscored
- Baseline price
- —
- Evaluation price
- —
- Move
- —
- Neutral threshold
- ±1.00%
- Price provider
- —
- Evaluated at
- 13 Oct 2026, 06:11 UTC
- Policy version
- v1.0
Request a correction
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction