Prediction evidence

incorrectPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 9 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC · fetched 13 Oct 2026, 05:55 UTC

Michaël van de Poppe

@CryptoMichNL

Quoting · 8 Sept 2026, 17:00 UTC · context given to the AI

This has been a fascinating conversation with @1basemoney. I love data. I look at data for all the investment decisions that I make, and that’s why I wanted to talk with him about the Power Law. What’s the actual valuation of #Bitcoin? Where are we in the cycle? His model predicts Bitcoin’s price could reach $1.1 million by 2033. Fascinating. Matthew Mezinskis built the model. He's the macro researcher behind the #Bitcoin Power Law model, and his claim isn't that Bitcoin will moon someday, it's that Bitcoin follows a mathematical growth curve, has for its entire life, and is currently trading at about half of where that curve says it should be. His summary of the math: "Let's go out about eight years. We should be at a million dollars per Bitcoin." The mechanics are almost absurdly simple. Every 13% increase in Bitcoin's lifespan doubles the price. That compounds into roughly a 10x every eight years. No halving cycles, no narratives, no adoption guesses, just time and a curve that's held for over a decade while skeptics called it broken. We cover: - The power law explained: why price scales with time, not hype - Why he says the current price sits at half of fair value on the curve - Power law vs stock-to-flow: why the exponential models failed and this one didn't - What a decade of data says about the curve holding - Bitcoin vs gold, and where this ends if the math keeps working Thanks for @OKX for being the sponsor of todays episode! Timestamps: 00:00 - Introductio 01:10 - Bitcoin's Recent Moves 04:06 - Bitcoin's Cycles 07:21 - Bitcoin vs Traditional Assets 10:57 - The Power Law Explained 11:23 - Bitcoin vs Gold 21:16 - Power Law vs Stock-to-Flow 34:56 - The Power Law In Pricing 46:48 - What History Tells Us 51:07 - Bitcoin's Market Position 01:00:26 - Bitcoin's Global Role
I put a thesis to Matthew Mezinskis that half of crypto believes right now: gold just made its most violent upside move since 1980, gold moves first, then consolidates, then Bitcoin follows, so the rotation out of gold pushes #Bitcoin higher this cycle. He agreed gold is the right comparison. Then he took the other side of the conclusion: "I don't think necessarily there's going to be trillions and trillions of dollars coming from the gold market into Bitcoin." His reason is the most data-guy answer possible. It's not about flows or narratives, it's that the two assets don't even grow in the same mathematical universe: "Gold, like any other asset, goes on an exponential curve, a straight line on log-linear scale. Bitcoin goes on a power curve, a straight line on log-log scale. They're just very different. I put a lot of stock into those differences." Gold, in his read, stays in its channel. And Bitcoin doesn't need the rotation: "Bitcoin is going to continue to grow as it does on this sustainable power trend." The nuance that stuck with me: gold went to $2,000 in 2011, then sideways for 13 years, which happens to be exactly the existence of Bitcoin. The outperformance was never a rotation story. It was two different curves doing what they do. So the bull case, per him, isn't "gold's money comes here." It's "Bitcoin doesn't need it." Thanks to @1basemoney for joining me on @new_era_finance
View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

  1. Baseline: first BTC price at or after publication, $78,582 at 9 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC.
  2. Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $77,219 at 10 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC.
  3. r = 77218.74 / 78582.07 − 1 = -1.73%
  4. Direction d = +1 (bullish), so d × r = -1.73% against a neutral band of ±1.00% → incorrect

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset
Bitcoin (BTC)
Direction
▲ Bullish
Intent
inferred
Horizon
24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span
“So the bull case, per him, isn't "gold's money comes here." It's "Bitcoin doesn't need it."”
Confidence
80%
Review state
auto accepted
Model / prompt
gemini-3.1-flash-lite · prompt-v1

Outcome record

Status
incorrect
Baseline price
$78,582
Evaluation price
$77,219
Move
-1.73%
Neutral threshold
±1.00%
Price provider
coinbase
Evaluated at
13 Oct 2026, 06:11 UTC
Policy version
v1.0

Request a correction