Prediction evidence
unscoredPolicy v1.0Source post
Published 19 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC · fetched 13 Oct 2026, 05:55 UTC
Ansem 🐂🀄️
@blknoiz06
Quoting · 17 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC · context given to the AI
bitcoin looks... good? https://t.co/anuH5GYUZelooks good send it https://t.co/YwXBgaLSM4 https://t.co/AQ8VrVOKVcView original on X ↗
How this was scored
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Repeat call within an existing 24h episode
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Same 24h episode
Repeated same-asset, same-direction calls count once, anchored to the first eligible post
- “to simplify this thesis: AI overspending will not affect change quick enough, so then gold rips, as that happens bitcoin rips onchain economy is already inflecting up as its obviously more efficient to trade RWAs on chain, perps+fx+stables go infinite $BTC 10T $HYPE 1T $SOL 1T https://t.co/yn62vAZjC6”Repeat19 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC
AI interpretation
Uses only text available at publication time
- Asset
- Bitcoin (BTC)
- Direction
- ▲ Bullish
- Intent
- inferred
- Horizon
- 24 hours (default, none stated)
- Evidence span
- “looks good send it”
- Confidence
- 70%
- Review state
- auto accepted
- Model / prompt
- gemini-3.1-flash-lite · prompt-v1
Outcome record
- Status
- unscored
- Baseline price
- —
- Evaluation price
- —
- Move
- —
- Neutral threshold
- ±1.00%
- Price provider
- —
- Evaluated at
- 13 Oct 2026, 06:11 UTC
- Policy version
- v1.0
Request a correction
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction