Prediction evidence
unscoredPolicy v1.0Source post
Published 10 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC · fetched 13 Oct 2026, 05:55 UTC
Michaël van de Poppe
@CryptoMichNL
Quoting · 9 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC · context given to the AI
4 years from now, people will be depressed that Bitcoin crashed to $120,000 https://t.co/0sPjSj2nezI don't think we'll have diminishing returns as I think the theory is flawed. We're on the edge of the biggest adoption curve for #Bitcoin and #Crypto. Gold has just seen its largest breakout in history. #Bitcoin is about to follow, and that's why I don't expect the cycle to peak at $320,000. I generally believe we'll run to $500,000+.View original on X ↗
How this was scored
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Repeat call within an existing 24h episode
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Same 24h episode
Repeated same-asset, same-direction calls count once, anchored to the first eligible post
- “A strong signal for the markets. The basis trade has kept everyone short $BTC futures for years, which is why you're seeing a huge amount of net negative positioning in futures. The only occasion when this didn't happen was the 2025 breakout from $75K to $125K. Right now, the same signal is evident in the markets, indicating that traders want to flip long despite the net-negative basis trade strategy. Bullish!”Repeat10 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC
- “He hasn't been moving the markets. I'm glad that @saylor decided to sell $BTC as that's a bullish trigger for the markets. Why? Due to the fact that he's been selling Bitcoin last week, the theory of him impacting the markets will diminish. Markets went up. Saylor sold $100M+ in #Bitcoin. No reason to fear the markets. What he does is irrelevant. Now, let's move the markets up.”Repeat10 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC
AI interpretation
Uses only text available at publication time
- Asset
- Bitcoin (BTC)
- Direction
- ▲ Bullish
- Intent
- explicit
- Horizon
- 24 hours (default, none stated)
- Evidence span
- “I generally believe we'll run to $500,000+.”
- Confidence
- 90%
- Review state
- auto accepted
- Model / prompt
- gemini-3.1-flash-lite · prompt-v1
Outcome record
- Status
- unscored
- Baseline price
- —
- Evaluation price
- —
- Move
- —
- Neutral threshold
- ±1.00%
- Price provider
- —
- Evaluated at
- 13 Oct 2026, 06:11 UTC
- Policy version
- v1.0
Request a correction
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction