Prediction evidence
unscoredPolicy v1.0Source post
Published 2 Aug 2026, 23:21 UTC · fetched 13 Oct 2026, 05:56 UTC
K A L E O
@CryptoKaleo
In reply to · 2 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC · context given to the AI
@CryptoKaleo 1 ETH target@NFTsAreNice HigherView original on X ↗
How this was scored
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Repeat call within an existing 24h episode
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Same 24h episode
Repeated same-asset, same-direction calls count once, anchored to the first eligible post
- “Floor gets pretty dang thin past .02 A quick move to 0.1 ETH+ feels pretty logical for the next leg up https://t.co/enmgR0SpWU”Repeat2 Aug 2026, 22:58 UTC
- “Imagine believing Pons won’t have a $100M+ cat coin that competes with Cashcat (e.g. WIF/BONK in the early Solana meme days) Would easily be the most bullish thing for both the launchpad and the entire ecosystem as a whole Thinking it’s not long before people catch on to this and start bidding heavily 🤔🐈”Repeat3 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC
AI interpretation
Uses only text available at publication time
- Asset
- Ethereum (ETH)
- Direction
- ▲ Bullish
- Intent
- explicit
- Horizon
- 24 hours (default, none stated)
- Evidence span
- “@NFTsAreNice Higher”
- Confidence
- 70%
- Review state
- auto accepted
- Model / prompt
- gemini-3.1-flash-lite · prompt-v1
Outcome record
- Status
- unscored
- Baseline price
- —
- Evaluation price
- —
- Move
- —
- Neutral threshold
- ±1.25%
- Price provider
- —
- Evaluated at
- 13 Oct 2026, 06:11 UTC
- Policy version
- v1.0
Request a correction
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction