Prediction evidence
unscoredPolicy v1.0Source post
Published 29 Jul 2026, 16:40 UTC · fetched 12 Oct 2026, 06:31 UTC
The Wolf Of All Streets
@scottmelker
Quoting · 29 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC · context given to the AI
https://t.co/2pNUyHbEse"Core Scientific spent roughly $12.2 million more mining Bitcoin than that mining generated in revenue" The Core Scientific numbers that show how hard pure Bitcoin mining has become "You can dive into the numbers. Look at the second quarter results from Core Scientific. Their total revenue was $164.2 million, and $136.7 of that came from AI and high density colocation, approximately 83% of their total revenues" "Bitcoin self mining revenue was $21.5 million, versus $136.7 on AI. The cost of that mining was $33.7 million" "It just shows how hard it is to be a pure Bitcoin miner in this industry, especially when prices are depressed"View original on X ↗
How this was scored
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
AI interpretation
Uses only text available at publication time
- Asset
- Bitcoin (BTC)
- Direction
- ▼ Bearish
- Intent
- inferred
- Horizon
- 24 hours (default, none stated)
- Evidence span
- “It just shows how hard it is to be a pure Bitcoin miner in this industry, especially when prices are depressed”
- Confidence
- 70%
- Review state
- needs review · Low confidence (70%)
- Model / prompt
- gemini-3.1-flash-lite · prompt-v1
Outcome record
- Status
- unscored
- Baseline price
- —
- Evaluation price
- —
- Move
- —
- Neutral threshold
- ±1.00%
- Price provider
- —
- Evaluated at
- 13 Oct 2026, 06:11 UTC
- Policy version
- v1.0
Request a correction
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction