Prediction evidence

unscoredPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 29 Jul 2026, 16:40 UTC · fetched 12 Oct 2026, 06:31 UTC

The Wolf Of All Streets

@scottmelker

Quoting · 29 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC · context given to the AI

https://t.co/2pNUyHbEse
"Core Scientific spent roughly $12.2 million more mining Bitcoin than that mining generated in revenue" The Core Scientific numbers that show how hard pure Bitcoin mining has become "You can dive into the numbers. Look at the second quarter results from Core Scientific. Their total revenue was $164.2 million, and $136.7 of that came from AI and high density colocation, approximately 83% of their total revenues" "Bitcoin self mining revenue was $21.5 million, versus $136.7 on AI. The cost of that mining was $33.7 million" "It just shows how hard it is to be a pure Bitcoin miner in this industry, especially when prices are depressed"
View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

unscored Awaiting manual review

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset
Bitcoin (BTC)
Direction
▼ Bearish
Intent
inferred
Horizon
24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span
“It just shows how hard it is to be a pure Bitcoin miner in this industry, especially when prices are depressed”
Confidence
70%
Review state
needs review · Low confidence (70%)
Model / prompt
gemini-3.1-flash-lite · prompt-v1

Outcome record

Status
unscored
Baseline price
—
Evaluation price
—
Move
—
Neutral threshold
±1.00%
Price provider
—
Evaluated at
13 Oct 2026, 06:11 UTC
Policy version
v1.0

Request a correction

Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.

Sign in to request a correction